ASSESSMENT OF PREGNANCY MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES AMONG PRIMIGRAVID WOMEN AT DONG NAI-2 HOSPITAL

Duong My Linh1, Do Thi Minh Nguyet2, Nguyen Dinh Duong3, Bui Quang Nghia1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Can Tho Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
3 Au Co Hospital

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate antenatal care practices, pregnancy abnormalities, and birth outcomes, and to identify associated factors among primigravid women.


Subjects and methods: A prospective longitudinal observational study  was conducted to evaluate antenatal care, pregnancy abnormalities, birth outcomes, and associated factors among primigravid women managed at Dong Nai-2 Hospital from June 2025 to February 2026.


Results: Of 202 participants, 15 (7.4%) experienced miscarriage, leaving 187 women followed throughout pregnancy. All underwent prenatal screening, and 99.5% completed tetanus vaccination. Antenatal care was initiated early, with 50.5% at 8-12 weeks and 48.5% before 8 weeks, and a mean of 13.7 visits. Pregnancy abnormalities occurred in 44.6%, most commonly gestational diabetes mellitus (24.8%) and prelabor rupture of membranes (17.3%). Cesarean section was the predominant mode of delivery (57.8%), mainly due to cephalopelvic disproportion (30.5%) and arrest of labor (13.4%). Neonatal outcomes were generally favorable, including low birth weight (5.9%), preterm birth (3.7%), and respiratory distress (0.5%), with unfavorable outcomes in 21.9%. In multivariable analysis, maternal age 25-34 years and rural residence were associated with higher odds of pregnancy abnormalities, whereas a first antenatal visit before 8 weeks was associated with lower odds. A higher number of antenatal visits was associated with reduced odds of unfavorable outcomes (aOR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.91), while pregnancy abnormalities increased this risk (aOR = 3.15, 95% CI: 1.53-6.49).


Conclusion: Despite generally adequate antenatal care, pregnancy abnormalities remained common and were the main determinant of adverse outcomes, underscoring the importance of early and continuous monitoring.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experienceGeneva: WHO. 2016.
[2] Mihretie GN, Habitamu A. Pregnancy outcomes among women who gave birth at health institutions: A cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(5):e843. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.843.
[3] Nguyen Thanh Hai, Vo Thi Ngoc Anh, Tran Thi My Hanh, Le Thi Hong Hanh, et al. Adolescent pregnancies: Characteristics and obstetric outcomes. Viet J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;18(3):27-33. https://doi.org/10.46755/vjog.2020.3.1111.
[4] Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, Lumbiganon P, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(1):e37-e46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30451-0.
[5] Li Y, Ren X, He L, Li J, et al. Maternal age and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 120 million participants. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;162:108044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108044.
[6] Tran Khanh Nga, Cao Ngoc Thanh, Pham Van Linh, Vo Thi Anh Trinh. Prevalence and associated factors of gestational diabetes mellitus: A multicenter, cross-sectional study in Mekong Delta region. J Med Res. 2024;177(14):83-90. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v177i4E14.2347.
[7] Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671.
[8] Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(4):824-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.127142.
[9] Okwaraji YB, Krasevec J, Bradley E, Conkle J, et al. National, regional, and global estimates of low birthweight in 2020, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2024;403(10431):1071-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01198-4.
[10] Ye W, Luo C, Huang J, Li C, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022;377:e067946. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067946