ASSESSMENT OF PREGNANCY MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES AMONG PRIMIGRAVID WOMEN AT DONG NAI-2 HOSPITAL

Duong My Linh1, Do Thi Minh Nguyet2, Nguyen Dinh Duong3, Bui Quang Nghia1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Can Tho Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
3 Au Co Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate antenatal care practices, pregnancy abnormalities, and birth outcomes, and to identify associated factors among primigravid women.


Subjects and methods: A prospective longitudinal observational study  was conducted to evaluate antenatal care, pregnancy abnormalities, birth outcomes, and associated factors among primigravid women managed at Dong Nai-2 Hospital from June 2025 to February 2026.


Results: Of 202 participants, 15 (7.4%) experienced miscarriage, leaving 187 women followed throughout pregnancy. All underwent prenatal screening, and 99.5% completed tetanus vaccination. Antenatal care was initiated early, with 50.5% at 8-12 weeks and 48.5% before 8 weeks, and a mean of 13.7 visits. Pregnancy abnormalities occurred in 44.6%, most commonly gestational diabetes mellitus (24.8%) and prelabor rupture of membranes (17.3%). Cesarean section was the predominant mode of delivery (57.8%), mainly due to cephalopelvic disproportion (30.5%) and arrest of labor (13.4%). Neonatal outcomes were generally favorable, including low birth weight (5.9%), preterm birth (3.7%), and respiratory distress (0.5%), with unfavorable outcomes in 21.9%. In multivariable analysis, maternal age 25-34 years and rural residence were associated with higher odds of pregnancy abnormalities, whereas a first antenatal visit before 8 weeks was associated with lower odds. A higher number of antenatal visits was associated with reduced odds of unfavorable outcomes (aOR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.91), while pregnancy abnormalities increased this risk (aOR = 3.15, 95% CI: 1.53-6.49).


Conclusion: Despite generally adequate antenatal care, pregnancy abnormalities remained common and were the main determinant of adverse outcomes, underscoring the importance of early and continuous monitoring.

Article Details

References

[1] World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experienceGeneva: WHO. 2016.
[2] Mihretie GN, Habitamu A. Pregnancy outcomes among women who gave birth at health institutions: A cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(5):e843. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.843.
[3] Nguyen Thanh Hai, Vo Thi Ngoc Anh, Tran Thi My Hanh, Le Thi Hong Hanh, et al. Adolescent pregnancies: Characteristics and obstetric outcomes. Viet J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;18(3):27-33. https://doi.org/10.46755/vjog.2020.3.1111.
[4] Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, Lumbiganon P, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(1):e37-e46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30451-0.
[5] Li Y, Ren X, He L, Li J, et al. Maternal age and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 120 million participants. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;162:108044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108044.
[6] Tran Khanh Nga, Cao Ngoc Thanh, Pham Van Linh, Vo Thi Anh Trinh. Prevalence and associated factors of gestational diabetes mellitus: A multicenter, cross-sectional study in Mekong Delta region. J Med Res. 2024;177(14):83-90. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v177i4E14.2347.
[7] Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671.
[8] Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(4):824-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.127142.
[9] Okwaraji YB, Krasevec J, Bradley E, Conkle J, et al. National, regional, and global estimates of low birthweight in 2020, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2024;403(10431):1071-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01198-4.
[10] Ye W, Luo C, Huang J, Li C, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022;377:e067946. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067946