KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICES OF INFECTIOUS PREVENTION AMONG PATIENTS UNDERGOING CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS AT BACH MAI HOSPITAL IN 2025
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objects: To describe the knowledge and practices related to infection prevention among patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis at the Nephrology - Urology and Dialysis Center, Bach Mai Hospital, in 2025.
Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on 121 patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
Results: 74.4% of patients had high knowledge scores; 19.8% had moderate knowledge levels, and only 5.8% had low knowledge. The group of questions related to peritonitis had the lowest mean error rate (5.5%). Questions concerning catheter exit-site infection had a mean error rate of 9.1%. The area with the greatest knowledge gap was the management of complications at home, with the highest mean error rate (9.5%). Regarding practice, most patients met the required performance standards, accounting for 76.9%. However, 23.1% did not meet the standards. Although over 50% of participants performed most procedural steps correctly, several steps related to hand hygiene and disinfection showed lower accuracy-particularly the 2 and 3 rounds of alcohol-based hand rub. Additionally, steps such as timing the procedure, observing the effluent, and documenting information after weighing the dialysis bag were not consistently completed
Conclusion: Most patients demonstrated a high level of knowledge regarding infection prevention, reflecting the initial effectiveness of counseling, guidance, and health education at the treatment facility. In terms of practice, the majority performed the required technical steps in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis adequately. However, some limitations still exist, therefore, enhanced communication, health education, and practical training are needed to improve knowledge, practices, and reduce infectious complications.
Article Details
Keywords
Knowledge, practices, infectious prevention, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
References
[2] Nguyễn Bách, Lê Chí Công. Đánh giá kết quả thực hiện chương trình “Khuyến khích chọn phương pháp lọc màng bụng tại nhà” tại Bệnh viện Thống Nhất. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2023, 527 (1): 203-206. doi: 10.51298/vmj.v527i1.5665
[3] Vương Tuyết Mai, Phạm Thanh Tuyền, Đỗ Gia Tuyển. Đánh giá kiến thức phòng tránh nhiễm trùng ở người bệnh lọc màng bụng liên tục ngoại trú. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học, 2015, 95 (5), tr. 74-82.
[4] Trần Văn Chất. Bệnh thận. Nhà xuất bản Y học, Hà Nôi, 2015, tr. 237-253.
[5] Bộ Y tế. Quy trình rửa tay thường quy (ban hành kèm theo Công văn số 7517/BYT-ĐTr ngày 21 tháng 10 năm 2007.
[6] Bernardini J. Training and retraining: Impact on peritonitis. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 2009, 30 (4): 434-436. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2009.00244
[7] Chow K.M, Szeto C.C, Law M.C. Influence of peritoneal dialysis training nurses’ experience on peritonitis rates. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2007, 2 (4): 647-652.
[8] Mujais S, Story K. Peritoneal dialysis in the US: evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohorts. Kidney International Suppl, 2006, 103: S21-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001912.
[9] Barone R.J, Campora M.I, Gimenez N.S. The importance of the patient’s training in chronic peritoneal dialysis and peritonitis. Adv Perit Dial, 2011, 27, 97-100.
[10] Bernardini J. Training and retraining: impact on peritonitis. Perit Dial Int, 2010, 30 (4): 434-6. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2009.00244.